A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Urban Institute paper says duals should be Medicare’s responsibility

Posted on October 5, 2011 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Key Developments
Library
Implementation Briefs

“Refocusing Responsibility For Dual Eligibles: Why Medicare Should Take The Lead,” a new paper authored by researchers at the Urban Institute and funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, explores why Medicare, as opposed to the States or Medicaid, should take responsibility for dual eligibles. The authors rationalize that acute care, where savings and quality improvement are most readily achievable, best falls under Medicare’s umbrella. According to the paper, enhancing State responsibility for overall spending, on the other hand, would increase the risk of cost-shifting to Medicare, which could potentially undermine the quality of care for vulnerable beneficiaries.

No Comments

Leave a Comment

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued guidance on Friday, April 27 regarding the process the agency will use to review and approve state demonstration projects under Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). The guidance outlines how CMS plans to implement requirements for improving public input and transparency with regard to the demonstration projects. These "1115 Waivers" authorize states to test new coverage and delivery models after obtaining appropriate waivers from CMS. The guidance, accompanied by a letter to state Medicaid directors, also introduces the user guide that CMS is providing for stakeholder organizations.
Today, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service (HHS) named 32 health care organizations that will participate in the Pioneer Accountable Care Organization Model. The goal of the new ACO Model is to encourage providers, hospitals, specialists, and caregivers to provide more coordinated care, which could save $1.1 billion over a five year period, HHS projects. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Innovation Center is spearheading this initiative and will reward groups that have formed ACOs based on improvements in health of their Medicare patients and their ability to lower health care costs. Under the Pioneer ACO Model, the 32 selected health care organizations will test the effectiveness of several innovative payment models. The goal of the Pioneer ACO model is to provide better care for beneficiaries, improved coordination with private payers, a reduction Medicare cost growth, and rewards for health care providers that deliver high-quality care. The 32 selected Pioneer ACOs represent urban and rural organizations from various geographic regions of the country, covering 18 states and 860,000 Medicare beneficiaries.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) of the U.S. Department of Health of Health and Human Services (HHS) has announced a new round of initiatives to help improve quality and cost of care for individuals who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. CMS has issued three fact sheets, along with preliminary guidance in the form of a State Medicaid Director Letter (SMDL), further outlining these initiatives. They involve upcoming demonstrations on new financial models for improved care coordination, efforts to improve nursing home care quality, and information on a new technical assistance resource center that will help states better serve high-cost, high-need beneficiaries.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has issued a Request for Comment (RFC) on opportunities for aligning benefits and incentives to improve overall care for individuals eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid.
The current lack of coordination between Medicare and Medicaid creates barriers for dual eligibles to access care. Additionally, although they comprise only 15% of all Medicaid beneficiaries, dual eligibles account for nearly 40% of Medicaid expenditures. America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), a national trade association which represents much of the health insurance industry, recently released a proposal to address the serious fiscal and access challenges associated with dual eligibility. AHIP provides a menu of models for Medicare/Medicaid integration, which groups six models into three alternative approaches suited to States with varying readiness for integration. To learn more about dual eligibles, click here.
The Measure Applications Partnership (MAP), a public-private group of stakeholders working with the National Quality Forum (NQF) submitted the report, "Strategic Approach to Performance Measurement for Dual Eligible Beneficiaries," to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to detail potential health care quality measures for dual eligibles under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Dual eligible members account for a disproportionate share of Medicare and Medicaid spending. While dual eligibles make up only 15% of Medicaid enrollees, they account for 39% of all Medicaid expenditures. Similarly, dual eligibles account for 16% of Medicare enrollees and 27% of program expenditures. The MAP report proposes a broad outline for measuring health care quality for dual eligibles and for identifying difficulties in obtaining comprehensive treatment data. The five measures of quality that HHS could use to improve care and control spending for dual eligibles include 1) quality of life, 2) care coordination, 3) screening and assessment, 4) mental health and substance abuse, and 5) structural measures.
House and Senate Republicans have issued a new report on the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) program, a long-term care insurance program created by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The report, "CLASS' UNTOLD STORY: Taxpayers, Employers, and States on the Hook for Flawed Entitlement Program," was issued by the bicameral Repeal CLASS Working Group, and calls for the repeal of the CLASS program due to questions surrounding its financial sustainability.
The AARP has released a new study analyzing care management practices in integrated care models serving dual eligibles.
According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), in 2008 there were an estimated 9.2 million individuals who were eligible for and enrolled in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs (commonly referred to as “dual eligibles”). Two-thirds of dual eligibles qualify because they are over age 65, while the other third qualify because of a disability. Dual-eligible beneficiaries typically have multiple chronic conditions that require a higher level of care and result in increased spending relative to other Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries; however, their care is not usually coordinated. Policymakers have expressed concern that the lack of coordination between the two programs results in higher costs and poorer health outcomes than would be achieved if Medicare and Medicaid services were better integrated.