A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Republican Governors Public Policy Committee releases proposal to develop a more efficient Medicaid system

Posted on August 31, 2011 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Key Developments
Library
Implementation Briefs

The Republican Governors Public Policy Committee, a branch of the Republican Governors Association (RGA), released the proposal, “A New Medicaid: A Flexible, Innovative and Accountable Future,” which refers the super committee to 31 ideas for saving and reforming Medicaid. Specifically, the governors support block grants and capped allotments outside of a waiver and  the reform of multiple federal programs including workforce training programs.  The RGA report opposes cost shifting and tax increases. Key areas of agreement between the GOP report and the Democratic governors include the support of “dual-eligible” health care reform and an opposition to cost shifting proposals such as “blended rates.”

No Comments

Leave a Comment

Today, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released two final rules. The first rule revises the Medicare Conditions of Participation (CoPs) for hospitals and critical access hospitals (CAHs). CMS estimates that annual savings to hospitals and CAHs will be approximately $940 million per year. The second, the Medicare Regulatory Reform rule, will produce savings of $200 million in the first year by promoting efficiency. This rule eliminates duplicative, overlapping, and outdated regulatory requirements for health care providers. Among other changes, the final rules will...
Today the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), released a proposed rule on Medicaid payments. The proposed rule would implement Medicaid payment for primary care services furnished by certain physicians in years 2013 and 2014 at rates not less than Medicare rates in effect in that time period. The rule would apply to physicians who practice family medicine, general internal medicine, or pediatric medicine, and to services paid through Medicaid managed plans. The proposal also permits providers to charge higher rates for vaccinations under the federally backed Vaccines for Children program. CMS estimated the provision will cost the government $5.5 billion the first year, and $5.6 billion in the second.
Prior to passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), section 2110(b) of the Social Security Act excluded children who were eligible for health benefits coverage under a State health benefits program from CHIP. Over time, however, it became clear that in some States, children of State employees do not have access to affordable, comprehensive coverage options. Many of these children were within the income eligibility level of their State's CHIP program. Section 10203(b)(2)(D) of the ACA amends the definition of a targeted low-income child by permitting States to extend CHIP eligibility to children of State employees who are otherwise eligible under the State child health plan. At least six states have taken advantage of the new provision.
The Georgetown University Health Policy Institute published a report which examines the decline in state revenues and changes in Medicaid spending during the last two recessions to look more closely at what has been driving state budget deficits. As states have faced large budget deficits, some politicians have blamed Medicaid, claiming that rising program costs are crowding out other priorities. While spending in Medicaid has grown as a result of increased enrollment due to the recession, most of this added spending has been shouldered by the federal government. Although less frequently discussed, a greater challenge to state budgets during these difficult economic times has been the steep declines in revenues.
House and Senate Republicans have issued a new report on the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) program, a long-term care insurance program created by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The report, "CLASS' UNTOLD STORY: Taxpayers, Employers, and States on the Hook for Flawed Entitlement Program," was issued by the bicameral Repeal CLASS Working Group, and calls for the repeal of the CLASS program due to questions surrounding its financial sustainability.
The New England Journal of Medicine's perspective piece "Consensus and Conflict in Health System Reform--The Republican Budget Plan and the ACA" by Timothy Stoltzfus Jost, J.D., compares and contrasts Representative Paul Ryan's (R-WI) "Roadmap for America's Future" with the Affordable Care Act (ACA). In terms of their similarities, both plans would create a health care system in which many Americans purchase private health insurance using partially means-tested public subsidies through an exchange-based, information-rich competitive market, which is (more or less) open to all regardless of health status. Those who choose to remain uninsured would incur a penalty (or forgo a benefit), and those who purchased insurance would be responsible for significant costs. Jost also details five key differences between Roadmap and the ACA in the piece.
A high number of deaths occur every year due to potentially preventable adverse events, including medical errors, in the hospital setting. The most commonly cited research on this topic was published by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 1999. The IOM report, "To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System" stated that hospital acquired conditions (HACs) caused by medical errors are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States.[1] More recently, a 2007 study found that of 1.7 million infections acquired while a patient was receiving treatment in a hospital, 99,000 resulted in death in 2002.[2] In addition, there is also a significant cost burden associated with potentially preventable HACs. In 2000, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published a report estimating the cost burden of HACs to be almost $5 billion.[3]
Access to health care has been a prime focus of the Medicaid program since it’s enactment in 1965. A key aim of the Medicaid statute has been to integrate Medicaid beneficiaries into the general health care system, affording them insurance coverage that would enable them to secure care from the participating provider of their choice in a manner similar to that enjoyed by privately insured individuals and Medicare beneficiaries. It is evident, however, that despite Medicaid’s enormous achievements, access to “mainstream” medical care has remained elusive.
Medicaid provides health insurance to the poorest and most medically vulnerable populations. Low-income pregnant women, children, and very poor parents of minor children are the majority of beneficiaries; Medicaid also provides coverage for children and adults with severe disabilities, as well as “wrap-around” coverage for low-income Medicare beneficiaries who cannot pay for services and cost-sharing that Medicare does not cover, particularly institutional and home- and community-based long-term care. Medicaid is jointly funded by states and the federal government and administered by states under broad federal standards.
In recessionary times, states seek to reduce Medicaid spending; paradoxically, this is when the need for public insurance may be the highest. During the recession that occurred in the early 2000s, two-thirds of all states reduced Medicaid eligibility, removing between 1.2 and 1.6 million children and adults from the program before Congress enacted legislation barring further cuts as a condition of additional federal assistance. The current recession is far more serious, and state budget shortfalls, far greater.