Prominent Republican Discusses Importance of Medicaid on Senate Floor
Posted on December 19, 2011 | No Comments
PDF Version
Details
Implementation Briefs
Library
Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, gave a speech on the Senate floor warning members of the dire consequences to Congressional powers if the Supreme Court finds in favor of States on the ‘Medicaid Commandeering’ argument. The Court has agreed to hear oral arguments on multiple challenges to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) over a three day stretch in late March of 2012. These challenges include an objection by States of the Medicaid expansion provisions of the ACA, which require States to expand Medicaid eligibility to 133% of the federal poverty level (FPL) in order to receive additional federal dollars.
For more information on the Medicaid eligibility changes under health reform, click here.
January 4, 2012
On November 14, 2011 the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear oral arguments on issues that have arisen as a result of more than two dozen legal challenges to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) that were filed upon or immediately following the March 2010 enactment of the health reform law. The Court will consider four constitutional issues related to the ACA: (1) whether Congress has the power under Article I of the Constitution to enact the coverage requirement; (2) if the coverage requirement is found unconstitutional, whether it is severable from the remainder of the ACA; (3) whether the ACA’s requirement that states expand Medicaid eligibility or risk losing federal funds is unduly coercive in violation of the Tenth Amendment; and (4) whether the individual coverage requirement is a tax for purposes of the Anti-Injunction Act, meaning that plaintiffs seeking to challenge the requirement must wait until it takes effect in 2014.
Oral arguments are set for March 26-28, 2012, and a decision is expected by the end of the Court’s term in late June of 2012.
August 31, 2011
This update to the Medicaid Implementation and health insurance Exchange Briefs reviews a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) implementing the Medicaid and CHIP eligibility, enrollment simplification, and coordination provisions of the Affordable Care Act. Issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services on August 17, 2011, the rule is comprehensive in scope; its public comment period ends October 31, 2011.
The Medicaid NPRM is part of a group of three regulations, all of which are summarized at HealthReformGPS.org. Together the rules are designed to implement both the Medicaid eligibility expansions, the process of determining eligibility for premium tax credits and cost sharing assistance in the Exchange individual market, and standards for employers purchasing coverage in Exchanges. Collectively, the rules are designed to allow individuals and families to acquire and keep coverage and move more seamlessly among publicly-supported sources of health insurance as family income and circumstances change.
May 26, 2011
Access to health care has been a prime focus of the Medicaid program since it’s enactment in 1965. A key aim of the Medicaid statute has been to integrate Medicaid beneficiaries into the general health care system, affording them insurance coverage that would enable them to secure care from the participating provider of their choice in a manner similar to that enjoyed by privately insured individuals and Medicare beneficiaries. It is evident, however, that despite Medicaid’s enormous achievements, access to “mainstream” medical care has remained elusive.
April 15, 2010
Expands Medicaid to provide uniform coverage to all U.S. citizens and legal immigrants with incomes below 133 percent of the Federal Poverty Level.
April 13, 2010
Increases the federal matching rate to states for individuals newly eligible for Medicaid.
October 31, 2011
UC Berkeley, funded by grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The California Endowment, recently released the brief, "The Promise of the Affordable Care Act, the Practical Realities of Implementation: Maintaining Health Coverage During Life Transitions," which discusses seamless health coverage under the Affordable Care Act for individuals and families who lose health insurance because of a work or life transition. While outreach and education are essential for enrollment, such efforts are not sufficient to assure that those eligible will enroll in programs during these transition periods. This policy paper addresses the question, "How can implementation of the Affordable Care Act build on institutional connections and develop widespread cultural knowledge of the availability of coverage during life transitions that precipitate the loss of private coverage?"
October 27, 2011
An article recently published in Health Affairs, "Policy Makers Should Prepare For Major Uncertainties in Medicaid Enrollment, Costs, And Needs For Physicians Under Health Reform," presents findings from a simulation model using two nationally representative data sets to estimate Medicaid eligibility, participation, and population growth. The article warns that the number of Medicaid enrollments, associated costs, and number of new physicians needed could vary hugely under Medicaid expansion. The estimated number of people enrolling in Medicaid for the first time could vary by more than 10 million when the program changes are implemented in 2014. Additionally, costs could range from anywhere between $34 billion to $98 billion per year. The new enrollments could necessitate at least 4,500 and at most 12,100 new physicians. The study results indicate that policy makers should prepare for a great deal of unpredictability associated with Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) Medicaid reform.
October 25, 2011
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) released a paper pertaining to Congress's moves to redefine modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) to include Social Security income. CRS cites three issues that Congress should consider if the definition of income is changed. First, because MAGI can be computed largely from federal tax return information, verification of income is streamlined. Thus, by including additional provisions, there will be increased administrative complexity involved with calculating an individual's MAGI. Second, the original definition was developed to promote coordination between Medicaid and premium credits in the health insurance exchange. Thus, this definition change should not only apply to income definition for Medicaid, but also should apply to premium credits. Third, bill proposals have focused largely on the inclusion of Social Security benefits in MAGI for eligibility purposes. However, many other low-income programs include other types of income and asset holdings that are also excluded from MAGI.
September 16, 2011
A new Health Affairs Blog by Professor Sara Rosenbaum, a frequent contributor to HealthReformGPS.org, points out an issue with the medical necessity definition proposed in a glossary section of insurance terms that must be disclosed to consumers under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The glossary is part of a larger proposed rule on Summary of Benefits and Coverage information that must be disclosed to consumers by insurance companies. The rule defines medical necessity as "[h]ealth care services or supplies needed to prevent, diagnose, or treat an illness, injury, disease or its symptoms and that meets accepted standards of medicine," and could be viewed as discriminatory toward persons with disabilities because it omits the word "condition."





No Comments