HealthReformGPS is made possible through generous financial support from the RCHN Community Health Foundation. Visit them at

Obama’s deficit reduction proposal to super committee includes health savings

Posted on September 20, 2011 | No Comments

PDF Version

President Obama sent “Living Within Our Means and Investing in the Future: The President’s Plan for Economic Growth and Deficit Reduction,” his plan to jumpstart economic growth and job creation, to the Joint Committee yesterday. The plan proposes additional savings on top of those signed into law under the Budget Control Act. Specific to health savings, the President recommended cuts to erroneous and wasteful spending under Medicare and Medicaid. He stressed that he would “veto any bill that takes one dime from the Medicare benefits seniors rely on without asking the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations to pay their fair share.”

No Comments

Public comments are closed.

Medicaid paid for nearly half of the nation’s $263 billion long-term care expenditures in 2010. Federal law discourages individuals from artificially impoverishing themselves in order to establish financial eligibility for Medicaid. Specifically, those who transfer assets for less than fair market value during a specified time period before applying for Medicaid may be ineligible for coverage for long-term care for a period of time. The Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) extended the look-back period to 60 months and introduced new requirements for the treatment of certain types of assets, such as annuities, in determining eligibility. States are responsible for assessing applicants’ eligibility for Medicaid, the criteria for which varies by state. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) was asked to...
Americans have been engaged in an ongoing debate regarding the size of the federal deficit. Medicare and Medicaid spending are often implicated in these discussions. Some have called for a significant restructuring of both programs—premium support for Medicare and block grants for Medicaid. Reform proposals focus on reducing the rate of growth in spending in both programs to a rate close to the increase in economic growth. In a paper recently released by the Urban Institute, authors show that spending in both programs has been significantly affected by enrollment growth, but that both the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) project spending growth per enrollee in both programs to be less than private insurance expenditures and to be close to the growth in gross domestic product (GDP) per capita. The paper concludes that...
The Kaiser Family Foundation's Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured (KCMU) along with Health Management Associates (HMA) recently published "Moving Ahead Amid Fiscal Challenges: A Look at Medicaid Spending, Coverage and Policy Trends," which summarizes the results from a 50-State Medicaid Budget Survey for State Fiscal Years 2011 and 2012. The report also includes background on the Medicaid program, as well as current issues facing the program including how states are preparing for the implementation of national health reform.
In their recent publication, "Building Tomorrow's Healthcare System: The Pathway to High Quality, Affordable Care," BlueCross BlueShield Assocation (BCBSA) calls for incentives to reward safety and reinforce primary care. One of the nation's largest insurance companies, BCBSA encourages federal government to adopt "value-based purchasing" and urges individuals eligible for Medicare or Medicaid to enroll in managed care plans. The Association also wants faster implementation of these types of programs in order to show savings more quickly.
In her New England Journal of Medicine article, "Hard Choices--Alternatives for Reining in Medicare and Medicaid Spending," Dr. Meredith B. Rosenthal of the Harvard School of Public Health compares and contrasts the two most prominent proposals to reform health care: Paul Ryan's "Roadmap for America's Future" and the White House's Affordable Care Act (ACA). She summarizes the main arguments supporting and opposing the two plans. The beauty of Ryan's plan is that by fixing the federal government's contribution to Medicare and Medicaid to a formula unrelated to the growth of overall health care costs, it would guarantee controlled federal spending growth. However, this would also shift financial risk to beneficiaries and state governments. The ACA alters the landscape for control federal health care spending by creating new institutions intended to facilitate progress toward reform and by directly altering payment formulas for Medicare and Medicaid. The downside of this cost savings portion of the ACA is that implementation of payment and delivery reforms is complex.