A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

IOM holds first meeting on essential health benefits

Posted on January 14, 2011 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Key Developments
Library
Implementation Briefs

The Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) Committee on the Determination of Essential Health Benefits held its first meeting this week to discuss essential benefits under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The IOM is charged with making recommendations to the Secretary of HHS on the criteria for determining what constitutes essential health benefits for insurance plans sold in exchanges. For more information on essential benefits, click here.

No Comments

Public comments are closed.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Department of Labor (DoL), and the Department of the Treasury (DoT) released the joint final rule implementing the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. Under this law, insurers that offer coverage for mental health services are expected to treat mental health equitably, meaning cost-sharing and limits for mental health services should be comparable to that of physical health services. Several other specific provisions addressed in this rule include:
  • Parity for intermediate care offered in residential or outpatient settings and all plan standards (i.e. network adequacy and geographic limits);
  • Clarifying transparency expectations for insurers to remain compliant with the law; and
  • Eliminating provisions that enabled insurers to make exceptions for parity requirements for certain benefits offered.
The law was passed in 2008, and an interim final rule was issued in January 2010. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) also published an FAQ on today's rule.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) today releaseda mental health guidance to the states clarifying requirements under the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. Specifically, the letter address the applicability of the requirements under the parity law to Medicaid non-managed care benchmark and benchmark-equivalent plans as described in section 1937 of the Social Security Act, the Children’s Health Insurance Programs (CHIP) under title XXI of the Act, and Medicaid managed care programs as described in section 1932 of the Act.
The Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration published a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding implementation of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. Amongst other topics, the FAQs address...
A report recently published by Georgetown University's Health Policy Institute, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), describes how states and health insurers are adopting the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) essential health benefits (EHB) requirements. Pursuant to the ACA, insurers offering plans in the individual and small group health insurance Marketplaces are required to offer benefits within the 10 specified EHB categories. RWJF found that for most Americans, benefit coverage will not drastically change. If anything, most individuals will now have access to services previously not covered by insurance, such as maternity health, mental health, and prescription drugs.
The Commonwealth Fund published a study today describing how 24 states and the District of Columbia selected the benchmark plans to offer in their respective state insurance marketplaces. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) calls for a set of essential health benefits that state insurers must offer to ensure comprehensive and adequate coverage. The federal government permitted states to choose their own benchmark plans, pursuant to ACA requirements, that serve as a reference point for the essential health benefits package. All but five states have selected a small-group plan. This study analyzes the methodology used to select state benchmark plans, which included approaches such as intergovernmental collaboration, research, and stakeholder engagement.
Written by researchers at the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) and commissioned by the National Institute for Health Care Reform (NIHCR), the policy analysis describes the range of current state benefit mandates and federal health reform law provisions that will affect state approaches to benefit mandates in nongroup and fully insured small-group health plans. The analysis also examines Maryland, a state with a wide array of benefit mandates, to illustrate how mandates interact with essential health benefits.
On February 25th, 2013, final regulations implementing the essential health benefit (EHB) provisions of the Affordable Care Act were published in the Federal Register (78 Fed. Reg. 12834-12872). The EHB rules, which amend 45 C.F.R., apply to all non-grandfathered individual and small group health plans sold after January 1, 2014, as well as Medicaid benchmark and benchmark-equivalent health plans. The EHB rules also apply to...
This update to our March 2012 implementation brief reviews recent implementation efforts by the Administration in connection with coverage of contraceptives as a required element of required preventive services for all individual and (non-grandfathered) group health plans under the Affordable Care Act. The earlier brief reviewed the Administration’s final rules defining the scope of contraception coverage, as well as the scope of the religious exemption that would apply to employers that seek an exemption from this coverage requirement. Reflecting prior law on this matter, the final rule preserved...
The Affordable Care Act included a number of insurance market reforms designed to make health insurance more affordable and available. During consideration of the ACA, one criticism of the private insurance market was that the lack of standardization in descriptions of health insurance policies available made shopping for coverage both difficult and time consuming. The ACA included provisions designed to assist consumers in better understanding their health insurance coverage, and to assist in comparing their insurance policy with other available options. Among those provisions are requirements for plans offered in both the group and individual insurance markets to provide a summary of benefits and coverage and a uniform glossary of terms commonly used in health insurance policies.
Recent federal regulations requiring insurance coverage of contraception have generated controversy, especially as applied to religious employers. The requirement stems from an ACA provision requiring insurance coverage of preventive services. Section 2713 of the Public Health Service Act, as added by Section 1001 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), requires group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group or individual health insurance coverage to provide coverage without cost-sharing for certain preventive services, including preventive treatments and services for women recommended by The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in guidelines. The preventive services provisions of the Act...