A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

House Budget Committee’s FY2012 Budget Resolution proposes repeal of ACA

Posted on April 10, 2011 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Key Developments
Implementation Briefs
Library
Editor's Comment

“The Path to Prosperity: Restoring America’s Promise” is the House Budget Committee’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 budget resolution.  The sections “Strengthening the Social Safety Net,” and “Fulfilling the Mission of Health and Retirement Security for All Americans,”  encourage government to repeal and defund the Affordable Care Act (ACA), offering instead a reform proposal that builds upon the Rivlin-Ryan Medicare reform plan advanced in the President’s Fiscal Commission in 2010.  The FY2012 budget resolution proposes to 1) convert state Medicaid funding into a block grant, 2) offers Medicare beneficiaries the same health care options as members of Congress, 3) calls for the advance of social security solutions.

No Comments

Leave a Comment

Today, President Obama released the fiscal year 2013 (FY2013) budget. The budget totals $940.9 billion, and outlays $76.7 billion for the Department of Health and Human Services: 56 percent for Medicare, 30 percent for Medicaid and 8 percent for discretionary programs. The department will use these funds to invest in health care, disease prevention, social services, and scientific research. The budget seeks $358.5 billion in savings in Medicare and Medicaid...
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have released Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on Exchange eligibility and insurance premium tax credits, respectively. Additionally, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has released an NPRM related to the Medicaid eligibility expansion authorized by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). All three NPRMs are designed to simplify Exchange eligibility and enrollment by coordinating with state Medicaid agencies and the IRS to determine eligibility for premium tax credits and Medicaid under the new expanded eligibility rules laid out in the ACA. Also addressed in the proposed rules is the eligibility and calculation of tax credits for small businesses. For more information on the Medicaid eligibility expansion, click here. For more information on tax credits, click here. For more information on Exchange eligibility, click here. Finally, for more information on tax credits for small businesses, click here.
Since the enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), at least 27 lawsuits have been filed challenging the constitutionality of various provisions of the law. While nearly half of the lawsuits have been dismissed on procedural grounds, three district courts have found provisions challenged to be constitutional, and three have found them to be unconstitutional. Previous HealthReform GPS Implementation briefs/updates have discussed these lower court decisions. Following appeals of each of these rulings, the United States Courts of Appeals in the Fourth, Sixth, and Eleventh Circuits have now issued decisions as well. Most importantly, the appellate decisions continue to reflect a split in judicial opinion regarding the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate. Other important issues addressed by the appellate rulings concerned the constitutionality of the ACA Medicaid expansion and the question of whether the trial court in the Virginia cases (Liberty University v. Geithner and Commonwealth of Virginia v. Sebelius) had the authority to hear the cases at all.
This update to the Medicaid Implementation and health insurance Exchange Briefs reviews a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) implementing the Medicaid and CHIP eligibility, enrollment simplification, and coordination provisions of the Affordable Care Act. Issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services on August 17, 2011, the rule is comprehensive in scope; its public comment period ends October 31, 2011. The Medicaid NPRM is part of a group of three regulations, all of which are summarized at HealthReformGPS.org. Together the rules are designed to implement both the Medicaid eligibility expansions, the process of determining eligibility for premium tax credits and cost sharing assistance in the Exchange individual market, and standards for employers purchasing coverage in Exchanges. Collectively, the rules are designed to allow individuals and families to acquire and keep coverage and move more seamlessly among publicly-supported sources of health insurance as family income and circumstances change.
Access to health care has been a prime focus of the Medicaid program since it’s enactment in 1965. A key aim of the Medicaid statute has been to integrate Medicaid beneficiaries into the general health care system, affording them insurance coverage that would enable them to secure care from the participating provider of their choice in a manner similar to that enjoyed by privately insured individuals and Medicare beneficiaries. It is evident, however, that despite Medicaid’s enormous achievements, access to “mainstream” medical care has remained elusive.
In her New England Journal of Medicine article, "Hard Choices--Alternatives for Reining in Medicare and Medicaid Spending," Dr. Meredith B. Rosenthal of the Harvard School of Public Health compares and contrasts the two most prominent proposals to reform health care: Paul Ryan's "Roadmap for America's Future" and the White House's Affordable Care Act (ACA). She summarizes the main arguments supporting and opposing the two plans. The beauty of Ryan's plan is that by fixing the federal government's contribution to Medicare and Medicaid to a formula unrelated to the growth of overall health care costs, it would guarantee controlled federal spending growth. However, this would also shift financial risk to beneficiaries and state governments. The ACA alters the landscape for control federal health care spending by creating new institutions intended to facilitate progress toward reform and by directly altering payment formulas for Medicare and Medicaid. The downside of this cost savings portion of the ACA is that implementation of payment and delivery reforms is complex.
The New England Journal of Medicine's perspective piece "Consensus and Conflict in Health System Reform--The Republican Budget Plan and the ACA" by Timothy Stoltzfus Jost, J.D., compares and contrasts Representative Paul Ryan's (R-WI) "Roadmap for America's Future" with the Affordable Care Act (ACA). In terms of their similarities, both plans would create a health care system in which many Americans purchase private health insurance using partially means-tested public subsidies through an exchange-based, information-rich competitive market, which is (more or less) open to all regardless of health status. Those who choose to remain uninsured would incur a penalty (or forgo a benefit), and those who purchased insurance would be responsible for significant costs. Jost also details five key differences between Roadmap and the ACA in the piece.
A new article released in the February 2011 issue of Health Affairs, co-authored by Professor Benjamin Sommers, MD, PhD, of the Harvard School of Public Health, and Professor Sara Rosenbaum, JD, Chair of the Department of Health Policy at the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, examines the potential for gaps in health coverage for some Americans under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
On September 23, 2010, Congressional Republicans released a document entitled “A Pledge to America” to help voters in November better understand their position on a broad set of policy issues. Featured in the document, is a pledge to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), and replace it with “common-sense solutions focused on lowering costs and protecting American jobs.”