A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

HHS releases bulletin on essential benefits, allows for state flexibility

Posted on December 16, 2011 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Implementation Briefs
Library
Key Developments

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has issued a pre-rule informational Bulletin which lays out its proposed approach for determining the Essential Benefits package required of all qualified health plans (QHPs) under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). HHS deferred to States’ judgment by allowing a State to create a benchmark essential benefits package from a currently-available plan within the State, as long as the package includes benefits from the ten benefit categories laid out in the ACA. HHS proposes that States choose the benchmark plan from a list of plan types:

  • One of the three largest small group plans in the State by enrollment
  • One of the three largest State employee health plans by enrollment
  • One of the three largest federal employee health plan options by enrollment
  • The largest HMO plan offered in the State’s commercial market by enrollment

If a State does not select a benchmark plan, HHS intends to propose that the default benchmark be the benefits package from the largest small group plan within the State.

For more information on Essential Benefits, click here.

No Comments

Leave a Comment

In February 2012, CMS issued a supplemental document entitled Frequently Asked Questions on Essential Health Benefits Bulletin. This supplement to the December 16th Bulletin provides answers to 22 questions arising from the December 16th Bulletin itself. Highlights are as follows:
This update to our March 2012 implementation brief reviews recent implementation efforts by the Administration in connection with coverage of contraceptives as a required element of required preventive services for all individual and (non-grandfathered) group health plans under the Affordable Care Act. The earlier brief reviewed the Administration’s final rules defining the scope of contraception coverage, as well as the scope of the religious exemption that would apply to employers that seek an exemption from this coverage requirement. Reflecting prior law on this matter, the final rule preserved...
The Affordable Care Act included a number of insurance market reforms designed to make health insurance more affordable and available. During consideration of the ACA, one criticism of the private insurance market was that the lack of standardization in descriptions of health insurance policies available made shopping for coverage both difficult and time consuming. The ACA included provisions designed to assist consumers in better understanding their health insurance coverage, and to assist in comparing their insurance policy with other available options. Among those provisions are requirements for plans offered in both the group and individual insurance markets to provide a summary of benefits and coverage and a uniform glossary of terms commonly used in health insurance policies.
Recent federal regulations requiring insurance coverage of contraception have generated controversy, especially as applied to religious employers. The requirement stems from an ACA provision requiring insurance coverage of preventive services. Section 2713 of the Public Health Service Act, as added by Section 1001 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), requires group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group or individual health insurance coverage to provide coverage without cost-sharing for certain preventive services, including preventive treatments and services for women recommended by The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in guidelines. The preventive services provisions of the Act...
A series of in-depth case studies based on site visits and reports from national data sets tracks how the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is being implemented in states and establishes a baseline for measuring progress over the coming years. The reports, prepared by researchers at the Urban Institute and Georgetown University’s Health Policy Institute, are designed to share background information, processes, and learnings that can inform the work of state government agencies, policy-makers, and others across the country as ACA implementation progresses. In the first reports, the authors found that...
Alan Weil, Executive Director of the National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP) recently authored "The Value of Federalism in Defining Essential Health Benefits" in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). The perspective piece addresses Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius's December 2011 announcement, stating that there would not be one single national definition of Essential Health Benefits. Rather, each state will have 10 options to choose from in defining the EHBs, 7 of which are tied to existing coverage in that state's small-group, state-employee, and health maintenance organization markets. Weil then relates Sebelius's announcement to the principles of federalism. He argues that there are three potential benefits associated with permitting states to make these decisions with respect to the EHBs. These three advantages relate to learning what works, tailoring policies to local conditions, and reflecting citizens’ values.
An issue brief released by the Employee Benefit Research Institute presents findings from the 2011 EBRI/MGA Consumer Engagement in Health Care Survey. This study is based on an online survey of 4,703 privately insured adults ages 21–64 to provide nationally representative data regarding the growth of consumer-driven health plans (CDHPs) and high-deductible health plans (HDHPs), and the impact of these plans and consumer engagement more generally on the behavior and attitudes of adults with private health insurance coverage. The 2011 EBRI/MGA Consumer Engagement in Health Care Survey found...
On December 16, 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released a Bulletin describing the approach it intends to take in future rulemaking to define the essential health benefits (EHB) under the Affordable Care Act. This document of frequently asked questions (FAQs) is intended to provide additional guidance on HHS’s intended approach to defining EHB. This bulletin describes a comprehensive, affordable and flexible proposal and informs the public about the approach that HHS intends to pursue in rulemaking to define EHB.  HHS intends to propose that EHB are defined using a benchmark approach. Under the department’s intended approach, states would have the flexibility to select a benchmark plan that reflects the scope of services offered by a “typical employer plan.” This approach would give states the flexibility to select a plan that would best meet the needs of their citizens.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) identified ten categories of services and items to be included in essential health benefits (EHBs), and specified that the scope of EHBs must be equal to the scope of benefits provided under a typical employer plan. The ten categories include: ambulatory patient services; emergency services; hospitalization; maternity and newborn care; mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment; prescription drugs; rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices; laboratory services; preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management; and pediatric services, including oral and vision care. A white paper issued in December by the Department of Health and Human Services's Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) found...
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released a document which provides illustrative information to complement the bulletin on essential health benefits (EHB) under the Affordable Care Act released on December 16, 2011. While the document included names of plans, it did not indicate what benefits are covered by those plans or what benefits it would like to see in future plans. The HHS document provides a list of the products with the three largest enrollments in the small group market in each State using data from HealthCare.gov. It provides the names of the three largest products in each State ranked by enrollment. In addition, it provides a list of the top three nationally available Federal Employee Health Benefit Program (FEHBP) plans based on enrollment. The purpose of the list, according to HHS, is to facilitate a better understanding of the intended approach to EHBs.