A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

FY2013 budget targets Medicare and Medicaid

Posted on February 13, 2012 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Library
Implementation Briefs
Key Developments

Today, President Obama released the fiscal year 2013 (FY2013) budget. The budget totals $940.9 billion, and outlays $76.7 billion for the Department of Health and Human Services: 56 percent for Medicare, 30 percent for Medicaid and 8 percent for discretionary programs. The department will use these funds to invest in health care, disease prevention, social services, and scientific research.

The budget seeks $358.5 billion in savings in Medicare and Medicaid, principally through reduced payments to health care providers and avoidance of tougher measures. These cuts in Medicare’s payments to health care providers would total about $267 million over the next decade. Medicare savings would total $302.8 billion over 10 years by adjusting the structure of the Medicare benefit to encourage beneficiaries to seek value in their health care choices, and encouraging high-quality, efficient care, and increasing the availability of generic drugs and biologics. The Budget includes $55.7 billion in savings over 10 years to make Medicaid more flexible, efficient, and accountable while strengthening Medicaid program integrity. Together, the FY 2013 discretionary budget request and these legislative proposals allow HHS to support the Administration’s challenging yet complementary goals of investing in the future and establishing a sustainable fiscal outlook.

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) could see a $1 billion increase in funding to $4.8 billion for 2013. About $860 million of those increased dollars are already earmarked for development of federal health insurance exchanges. The remainder will be applied to other ACA programs. The budget requests $1 billion to continue implementing the Affordable Care Act; $2 billion for the Administration on Aging to help seniors remain independent; $599 million for effectiveness research; and more than $8 billion for the Head Start program.

Preventative and public health services took a hit in the FY2013 budget.  The President proposed to cut base funding for the CDC by $660 million, including its signature Community Transformation Grant program (cut by $80 million), and suggested a reduction in the Prevention and Public Health Fund (Fund) by $4.5 billion over the next ten years.  The 11 percent cut to CDC’s budget authority is the largest cut within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), a $1.4 billion cut (over 20 percent) since Fiscal Year 2010.

No Comments

Leave a Comment

According to an issue brief recently published by the Heritage Foundation, wealthy seniors should pay more in Medicare premiums. Taxpayers spend an extra $4,897 per Medicare beneficiary beyond what is collected in taxes and premiums. Currently, Medicare beneficiaries pay a basic premium for Part B of $99.90 per month, which covers some costs while the remaining costs are covered by subsidies from the general revenue. The subsidy declines for married seniors with combined income above $170,000. When a senior’s income reaches $428,000, the premium tops out at $319.70 per month, leaving a 20 percent subsidy. According to the report, a retired couple with a $428,000 combined salary would have total financial assets worth more than $7.1 million, excluding the value of their home. In other words, this means that multimillionaire retiree seniors still qualify for a 20 percent Medicare subsidy. The report explores this issue and suggests eliminating premium subsidies for such high income Medicare beneficiaries.
The Kaiser Family Foundation recently released an issue brief which compares the expected value of benefits for individuals ages 65 and older under Medicare's fee-for-service program to two "typical" plans offered by large employers: a typical large employer preferred provider organization (PPO) plan and the Blue Cross/Blue Shield Standard Option for enrollees in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), also a PPO plan. The analysis updates a 2008 Kaiser Family Foundation report that found...
The National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI) released a paper reviewing the findings of the 2012 Medicare Trustees Report. Medicare is the federal health insurance program for Americans aged 65 and older and younger adults with disabilities. Medicare's finances are managed through the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund and the Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund. Each year, the Medicare Trustees (Timothy Geithner, Hilda Solis, Kathleen Sebelius, Michael Astrue, Charles Blahous, Robert Reischauer, and Marilyn Tavenner) provide a detailed account of the expected condition of the program's two trust funds over the short and long-term. The 2012 Trustees Report shows...
"The Path to Prosperity: Restoring America's Promise" is the House Budget Committee's Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 budget resolution. The sections "Strengthening the Social Safety Net," and "Fulfilling the Mission of Health and Retirement Security for All Americans," encourage government to repeal and defund the Affordable Care Act (ACA), offering instead a reform proposal that builds upon the Rivlin-Ryan Medicare reform plan advanced in the President's Fiscal Commission in 2010. The FY2012 budget resolution proposes to 1) convert state Medicaid funding into a block grant, 2) offers Medicare beneficiaries the same health care options as members of Congress, 3) calls for the advance of social security solutions.
In a letter to Speaker of the House John Boehner, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) notified Congress that the recently-introduced bill aimed at repealing the Afforadable Care Act (ACA) would add approximately $230 billion to federal deficits during the years 2012 - 2021. CBO also estimates that the bill, H.R. 2: Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act, would increase the number of uninsured Americans by 32 million over the next decade.
The complexity and size of the U.S. health care system makes it susceptible to fraud and abuse in both the public and private insurance markets. According to the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (NHCAA), an estimated 3% of all health care spending is lost to fraud; government and law enforcement agencies have estimated fraud-related loses to be as high as 10% of annual health care expenditures. The financial ramifications of these fraudulent schemes are enormous to patients, providers and the federal government. Indeed, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) estimates that for 2010, Medicare alone had $48 billion in improper payments (underpayments and overpayments). In response to its findings, the GAO recommended that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services find ways to address the vulnerabilities to improper payments and enhance program integrity.
The complexity and size of the U.S. health care system makes it susceptible to fraud and abuse in both the public and private insurance markets. According to the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (NHCAA), an estimated 3% of all health care spending is lost to fraud; government and law enforcement agencies have estimated fraud-related loses to be as high as 10% of annual health care expenditures. The financial ramifications of these fraudulent schemes are enormous to patients, providers and the federal government. Indeed, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) estimates that for 2010, Medicare alone had $48 billion in improper payments (underpayments and overpayments). In response to its findings, the GAO recommended that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services find ways to address the vulnerabilities to improper payments and enhance program integrity.