A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Editor’s Comment: GOP Promises to Repeal and Replace Affordable Care Act in “Pledge to America”

Posted on October 8, 2010 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Library

On September 23, 2010, Congressional Republicans released a document entitled “A Pledge to America” to help voters in November better understand their position on a broad set of policy issues. Featured in the document, is a pledge to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), and replace it with “common-sense solutions focused on lowering costs and protecting American jobs.”

Summary of GOP Repeal and Replace

Repeals all provisions of the ACA and would replace with: medical liability reform; prohibiting coverage denials and annual and lifetime spending caps for people with prior coverage who have or develop pre-existing conditions; allowing the purchase health insurance across state lines; expanding health savings accounts, strengthening the doctor-patient relationship, ensuring access for patients with pre-existing conditions, expanding high risk pools and reinsurance and provides incentives to states to develop programs to lower premiums and increase coverage, and permanently prohibiting taxpayer funding of abortions.

Key Differences between ACA and “Pledge” Principles

Insurance Reforms

The ACA prohibits health insurance discrimination against all individuals with pre-existing conditions and limits the ability of insurers to charge higher premiums for the sickest individuals. The GOP replacement prohibits insurance discrimination against people who had previous coverage, but does not apply to individuals who are uninsured or have breaks in coverage, and places no limits on how much more an insurer may charge for the sickest individuals. The ACA provides for temporary high-risk pools and reinsurance coverage until insurance reforms are effective, and the GOP replacement does not appear to end those programs. The ACA provides grants to states to establish insurance exchanges, a marketplace for those without employer coverage and small businesses. The GOP replacement allows the purchase of insurance across state lines and lets small groups join together to purchase coverage.

Affordability

The ACA provides tax credits to families and small businesses to help them afford premiums, and expands the Medicaid program for the poorest individuals. The GOP proposal would expand health savings accounts (HSAs) that accompany high-deductible health plans, and provide incentives to states to lower premiums and reduce the number of uninsured Americans.

Improving Quality and Lowering Health Costs

The ACA includes provisions to improve quality and lower costs through delivery system reforms such as chronic disease management, medical homes, anti-fraud initiatives and investments to improve workforce, public health and long-term care. The GOP replacement would lower costs through medical liability reform.

Impact on the Federal Deficit

The ACA reduces the deficit by $143 billion from 2010-2019. The document does not indicate whether the GOP plans to pay for the cost of repeal, which if unaddressed, will add an estimated $455 billion to the deficit over the next 10 years, the document does, however, indicate that the GOP plans to “put the government on a path to a balanced budget.”

Taxpayer Coverage of Abortion Services

Since 1976, federal appropriations law has imposed limits on the use of federal funds to finance abortions. The ACA establishes restrictions on abortion coverage in the case of individual and group health plans sold in state exchanges. The GOP replacement “permanently prohibits taxpayer finding of abortion.” For more information on ACA and abortion coverage see the implementation brief: Abortion Coverage.

Impact on Current Law

Although many provisions of the ACA do not go into effect until 2014, some provisions have already been implemented. Those provisions already in place which would be repealed include among other provisions: phase-one of closing the Medicare prescription drug “donut hole,” permitting dependents to age 26 to remain on their parents insurance policies, tax-credits to small businesses to help them afford health insurance coverage for their employees, prohibiting insurers from imposing pre-existing conditions for children, home and community-based care options for seniors and individuals with disabilities and grants to community health centers. For a complete listing of provisions that have been implemented and would be repealed, see the Editor’s Comment: Six Months and Counting.

No Comments

Leave a Comment

In her New England Journal of Medicine article, "Hard Choices--Alternatives for Reining in Medicare and Medicaid Spending," Dr. Meredith B. Rosenthal of the Harvard School of Public Health compares and contrasts the two most prominent proposals to reform health care: Paul Ryan's "Roadmap for America's Future" and the White House's Affordable Care Act (ACA). She summarizes the main arguments supporting and opposing the two plans. The beauty of Ryan's plan is that by fixing the federal government's contribution to Medicare and Medicaid to a formula unrelated to the growth of overall health care costs, it would guarantee controlled federal spending growth. However, this would also shift financial risk to beneficiaries and state governments. The ACA alters the landscape for control federal health care spending by creating new institutions intended to facilitate progress toward reform and by directly altering payment formulas for Medicare and Medicaid. The downside of this cost savings portion of the ACA is that implementation of payment and delivery reforms is complex.
The New England Journal of Medicine's perspective piece "Consensus and Conflict in Health System Reform--The Republican Budget Plan and the ACA" by Timothy Stoltzfus Jost, J.D., compares and contrasts Representative Paul Ryan's (R-WI) "Roadmap for America's Future" with the Affordable Care Act (ACA). In terms of their similarities, both plans would create a health care system in which many Americans purchase private health insurance using partially means-tested public subsidies through an exchange-based, information-rich competitive market, which is (more or less) open to all regardless of health status. Those who choose to remain uninsured would incur a penalty (or forgo a benefit), and those who purchased insurance would be responsible for significant costs. Jost also details five key differences between Roadmap and the ACA in the piece.
"The Path to Prosperity: Restoring America's Promise" is the House Budget Committee's Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 budget resolution. The sections "Strengthening the Social Safety Net," and "Fulfilling the Mission of Health and Retirement Security for All Americans," encourage government to repeal and defund the Affordable Care Act (ACA), offering instead a reform proposal that builds upon the Rivlin-Ryan Medicare reform plan advanced in the President's Fiscal Commission in 2010. The FY2012 budget resolution proposes to 1) convert state Medicaid funding into a block grant, 2) offers Medicare beneficiaries the same health care options as members of Congress, 3) calls for the advance of social security solutions.