Editor's Comment
Editor’s Comment: One Year and Counting
Posted on March 23, 2011
March 23, 2011, marks the one-year anniversary of the Affordable Care Act, and the Administration’s first year implementation effort spans the full scope of the law. Major areas of implementation encompass the full range of reforms under the Act: improving performance in the private insurance and employer-sponsored health plan markets; strengthening Medicare, Medicaid and CHIP; improving health care access and building a stronger health workforce; improving health care quality and accountability; increasing investments in public health; strengthening health care fraud and abuse controls; and reforming federal policies applicable to tax-exempt hospitals.
Continue Reading "Editor’s Comment: One Year and Counting" »
Editor’s Comment: The Thomas More Decision- Finding the Constitutional in Health Reform
Posted on October 12, 2010
After a spring and summer of warm-up action in multiple courts, the first judicial verdict is in: health reform is constitutional. In Thomas More v Barak Hussein Obama (Case No. 10-CV 11156, E.D. Mich., October 7, 2010), Judge George Steeh quickly disposed of plaintiffs’ claims that the Affordable Care Act was unconstitutional.
Editor’s Comment: GOP Promises to Repeal and Replace Affordable Care Act in “Pledge to America”
Posted on October 8, 2010
On September 23, 2010, Congressional Republicans released a document entitled “A Pledge to America” to help voters in November better understand their position on a broad set of policy issues. Featured in the document, is a pledge to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), and replace it with “common-sense solutions focused on lowering costs and protecting American jobs.”
Editor’s Comment: ERISA Now and Forever
Posted on September 27, 2010
Enacted to secure the nation’s private pension system, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) has become a pillar of U.S. health policy because of the legal framework it establishes for employer-sponsored group health benefit plans. Even as it creates crucial protections for workers and their families, ERISA simultaneously diminishes the power of states to regulate employee health benefits. Furthermore, the law curtails the legal rights of patients who experience death or injury as a result of the negligence or misconduct of health benefit plan administrators. The Affordable Care Act preserves the ERISA framework, expanding the federal standards applicable to employee health benefit plans while preserving the law’s shielding effects against state regulation and health plan liability. A major unanswered question under the Act remains how the ERISA shield will affect the rights of patients whose employers purchase coverage through state Exchanges.
Continue Reading "Editor’s Comment: ERISA Now and Forever" »
Editor’s Comment: Six Months and Counting
Posted on September 23, 2010
The past six months have witnessed a remarkable implementation effort in the wake of passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. As would be expected in the case of legislation of such size — and consistent with previous federal laws involving matters of complex health policy, such as the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 and the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 — the Affordable Care Act assigns the overall task of making health reform happen to federal agencies. In many cases, agency implementation activities are in response to direct Congressional instructions to interpret and implement the law through regulations and other policies. In many other situations, agency implementation efforts are in furtherance of their specialized expertise and overall responsibility to carry out the broad requirements of U.S. law.
A review of agency actions following enactment of health reform underscores the scope of the law and the range if issues addressed by the agencies since passage. The Act’s four major pillars — comprehensive market reforms, the establishment of state health insurance exchanges, the Medicaid expansions, and the employer and individual responsibility provisions — do not take effect until January 1, 2014. At the same time, however, major reforms addressing the accessibility, quality and affordability of health insurance coverage, health care quality, access, efficiency and information, the health care workforce, and public health and prevention already are in effect or are poised to take effect.
The following table sets forth the major provisions of the Act as well as key agency implementation actions to date.
Major Agency Implementation Actions Under the Affordable Care Act
| Title and Issue | Agency Action |
| Title I. Quality Affordable Health Care for All Americans | |
| Immediate Improvements in Health Care Coverage for All Americans (§1001) |
|
| Immediate Actions to Preserve and Expand Coverage (§§1101-1105) |
|
| Preserving the Right to Maintain Existing Coverage (Grandfathered Health Plans) (§1253) |
|
| Consumer Choices and Insurance Competition Through Health Benefit Exchanges (§§1301-1321) |
|
| Small Business Tax Credit (§1421) |
|
| Title II. Role of Public Programs | |
| Improvements in Public Programs including Medicaid and Title V (§§2301-2406) |
|
| Improving Medicare for Patients and Providers; Medicare Part D Improvements (§§3101-3114; 3301-3315) |
|
| Title III. Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Health Care | |
| Patient Centered Outcomes Research (§6301) |
|
| Improving Payment Accuracy (§§3131-3143) |
|
| Health Care Quality Improvement (§3001) |
|
| Health Care Delivery System Research (§3501) |
|
| Title IV. Prevention of Chronic Disease and Improving Public Health | |
| National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council (§4001) |
|
| Prevention and Public Health Trust Fund (§4002) |
|
| Spending for Federally Qualified Health Centers (§5601) |
|
| Food Labeling (§4205) |
|
| Pregnancy Assistance (§§10211-10214) |
|
| National Prevention and Public Health Council (§4001) |
|
| Prevention and Public Health Investments (§4002) |
|
| Title V. Health Care Workforce | |
| Increasing the Supply of the Health Care Workforce (§§5201-5210) | $250 million awarded for expansion of primary care workforce for primary care residencies, physician assistant and nurse practitioner training, nurse-led clinics, and state workforce planning. (June 16, 2010) |
| Title VI. Transparency and Program Integrity | |
| Targeting Enforcement: Civil Money Penalties (§6111) |
|
| Fraud Prevention |
|
| Title VII. Improving Access to Innovative Medical Therapies | |
| More Affordable Medicines for Children and Medically Underserved Communities (§§7101-7103) |
|
| Title VIII. CLASS Act | |
| N/A | |
| Title IX. Revenue Provisions | |
| Requirements for Charitable Hospitals (§9007) | Regulatory development process initiated through a Request for Comments issued by the IRS and aimed at developing standards to ensure compliance by nonprofit hospitals with new federal community benefit obligations in the areas of community public health needs assessment and provision of discounted care to the uninsured. (May 27, 2010) |
| Limits on Health Flexible Spending Arrangements under Cafeteria Plans (§9005) | IRS guidance issued to implement revised standards governing coverage of over-the-counter drugs in flexible spending plans. (August 2010) |
| Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Project Program (§9023) | IRS issues policy standards for tax credits for qualifying therapeutic discovery projects, with available credits of up to $5 million per firm and $1 billion overall. (May 2010) |
| Tax benefits for providers working in medically underserved areas (§10908) | IRS issues policy expanding tax benefits for health care professionals practicing in underserved communities. (June 16, 2010) |
| Indoor tanning tax (§9017) | IRS guidelines on new tax policy issued. (June 2010) |
Continue Reading "Editor’s Comment: Six Months and Counting" »
Editor’s Comment: Un-Stacking the Deck Against Patients Insured through ERISA Health Plans
Posted on August 30, 2010
The Affordable Care Act is a complete game changer. Under its terms, as implemented by the US Labor Department, when a patient appeals a claims denial to an external reviewer, the review now is to be completely independent and binding on the plan. If the plan should refuse to go along with the decision, the patient can go to court and seek an order enforcing the decision against the plan.
Editor’s Comment: Medical Loss Ratio and Rebates in Private Health Insurance
Posted on August 25, 2010
A key issue for insurers, businesses and consumers in health reform is working its way through the regulatory process. Beginning January 1, 2011, insurers will be required to spend a minimum percentage of insurance premiums on medical expenses, as opposed to administrative and marketing costs or profits. Insurers that fail to meet these minimum percentages, called medical loss ratios, will be required to rebate the difference in premiums. Group policies will be required to spend 85 percent on medical expenses and individual policies must spend 80 percent on medical expenses.
Continue Reading "Editor’s Comment: Medical Loss Ratio and Rebates in Private Health Insurance" »




