<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Health Reform GPS: Navigating the Implementation Process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.healthreformgps.org</link>
	<description>Navigating the Implementation Process</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Commonwealth Fund issue brief finds health insurance improves outcomes for vulnerable populations</title>
		<link>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/commonwealth-fund-issue-brief-finds-health-insurance-improves-outcomes-for-vulnerable-populations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/commonwealth-fund-issue-brief-finds-health-insurance-improves-outcomes-for-vulnerable-populations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmcdowell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disparities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Party Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commonwealth Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthreformgps.org/?p=5648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the U.S., uninsured and low-income adults face significant health and health care inequities as compared to insured and higher-income individuals.  An <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/1600_Berenson_achieving_better_quality_care_low_income_v2.pdf" target="_blank">issue brief</a> analyzing the Commonwealth Fund 2010 Biennial Health Insurance Survey finds that when low-income adults have access to health insurance coverage and a medical home, they are less likely to report cost-related access problems, more likely to be up-to-date with preventive screenings, and report greater satisfaction with the quality of their care. Moreover, the gaps in health care between them and higher-income populations are significantly reduced. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) includes numerous provisions that will significantly expand health insurance coverage, especially to low-income patients, as well as provisions to promote medical homes. Along with supporting the full implementation of coverage expansions, it will be important for public and private stakeholders to create opportunities that enhance access to medical homes for vulnerable populations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the U.S., uninsured and low-income adults face significant health and health care inequities as compared to insured and higher-income individuals.  An <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/1600_Berenson_achieving_better_quality_care_low_income_v2.pdf" target="_blank">issue brief</a> analyzing the Commonwealth Fund 2010 Biennial Health Insurance Survey finds that when low-income adults have access to health insurance coverage and a medical home, they are less likely to report cost-related access problems, more likely to be up-to-date with preventive screenings, and report greater satisfaction with the quality of their care. Moreover, the gaps in health care between them and higher-income populations are significantly reduced. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) includes numerous provisions that will significantly expand health insurance coverage, especially to low-income patients, as well as provisions to promote medical homes. Along with supporting the full implementation of coverage expansions, it will be important for public and private stakeholders to create opportunities that enhance access to medical homes for vulnerable populations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/commonwealth-fund-issue-brief-finds-health-insurance-improves-outcomes-for-vulnerable-populations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCIIO announces potential plans for risk adjustment</title>
		<link>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/cciio-announces-potential-plans-for-risk-adjustment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/cciio-announces-potential-plans-for-risk-adjustment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmcdowell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCIIO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthreformgps.org/?p=5643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO) recently announced that the U.S. Department of Human Services (HHS) may use a a <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/fm-1c-risk-adj-model.pdf" target="_blank">concurrent model</a> for risk adjustment.  The overall goals of the risk adjustment model are to mitigate impacts of adverse selection and stabilize premiums in the individual and small group markets.

HHS will use the Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) classification system as a basis for the HHS risk adjustment model. This model utilizes diagnoses from all physician and hospital encounters, and profiles beneficiary medical problems with diagnostic categories (HCCs) that are not mutually exclusive. HCC classification provides a diagnostic framework for developing a risk adjustment model to predict medical spending and plan accordingly.

The concurrent risk adjustment model, if implemented, will use diagnoses in the current year to predict expenditures for that same year. Importantly, HHS plans to select a different set of HCCs for the Federal risk adjustment methodology than those used in Medicare to reflect the differences in population.

HCC was originally developed for CMS to do risk adjustment for Medicare Advantage and Part D prescription drug plans. The model will have to be adapted for the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) risk adjustment due to the presence of the private insurance market.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO) recently announced that the U.S. Department of Human Services (HHS) may use a a <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/fm-1c-risk-adj-model.pdf" target="_blank">concurrent model</a> for risk adjustment.  The overall goals of the risk adjustment model are to mitigate impacts of adverse selection and stabilize premiums in the individual and small group markets.</p>
<p>HHS will use the Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) classification system as a basis for the HHS risk adjustment model. This model utilizes diagnoses from all physician and hospital encounters, and profiles beneficiary medical problems with diagnostic categories (HCCs) that are not mutually exclusive. HCC classification provides a diagnostic framework for developing a risk adjustment model to predict medical spending and plan accordingly.</p>
<p>The concurrent risk adjustment model, if implemented, will use diagnoses in the current year to predict expenditures for that same year. Importantly, HHS plans to select a different set of HCCs for the Federal risk adjustment methodology than those used in Medicare to reflect the differences in population.</p>
<p>HCC was originally developed for CMS to do risk adjustment for Medicare Advantage and Part D prescription drug plans. The model will have to be adapted for the Affordable Care Act&#8217;s (ACA&#8217;s) risk adjustment due to the presence of the private insurance market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/cciio-announces-potential-plans-for-risk-adjustment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HHS publishes Exchange guidance and draft blueprint</title>
		<link>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/hhs-publishes-exchange-guidance-and-draft-blueprint-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/hhs-publishes-exchange-guidance-and-draft-blueprint-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmcdowell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCIIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OCIIO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthreformgps.org/?p=5638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/FFE_Guidance_FINAL_VERSION_0516121.pdf" target="_blank">published</a> guidance today on the implementation of the federally-run fallback exchange that the government will run in states that are not ready to operate a state-run exchange. In addition to the higher level operational approach, the paper also discusses how states can partner with HHS to implement selected functions in a Federally-facilitated Exchange (FFE), key policies organized by Exchange function, and how HHS will consult with a variety of stakeholders to implement an FFE. HHS also <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/Exchangeblueprint051620121.pdf" target="_blank">released</a> a draft blueprint for approval of state-based or state-federal partnership exchanges. State exchanges must be certified by HHS by the beginning of 2013.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/FFE_Guidance_FINAL_VERSION_0516121.pdf" target="_blank">published</a> guidance today on the implementation of the federally-run fallback exchange that the government will run in states that are not ready to operate a state-run exchange. In addition to the higher level operational approach, the paper also discusses how states can partner with HHS to implement selected functions in a Federally-facilitated Exchange (FFE), key policies organized by Exchange function, and how HHS will consult with a variety of stakeholders to implement an FFE. HHS also <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/Exchangeblueprint051620121.pdf" target="_blank">released</a> a draft blueprint for approval of state-based or state-federal partnership exchanges. State exchanges must be certified by HHS by the beginning of 2013.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/hhs-publishes-exchange-guidance-and-draft-blueprint-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HHS releases web-based search tool to track health care system performance</title>
		<link>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/hhs-releases-web-based-search-tool-to-track-health-care-system-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/hhs-releases-web-based-search-tool-to-track-health-care-system-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmcdowell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care Quality and Delivery System Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health System Measurement Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Quality Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthreformgps.org/?p=5615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Health and Human Services (HHS) <a href="http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2012pres/05/20120515b.html" target="_blank">announced</a> the launch of a new web-based <a href="https://healthmeasures.aspe.hhs.gov/" target="_blank">tool</a> to track how the nation's health care system is performing.  The tool, known as the Health System Measurement Project, will enable policymakers, providers, and the public to develop consistent data-driven views regarding changes in critical U.S. health system indicators. The tool brings together data sets from across the federal government that span topical areas, such as access to care, cost and affordability, prevention and health information technology. It presents these indicators by population characteristics, such as age, sex, income level, insurance coverage, and geography. The measures included in the tool were developed by the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. They are aligned with the HHS Strategic Plan, the National Quality Strategy, and other departmental strategic planning efforts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Health and Human Services (HHS) <a href="http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2012pres/05/20120515b.html" target="_blank">announced</a> the launch of a new web-based <a href="https://healthmeasures.aspe.hhs.gov/" target="_blank">tool</a> to track how the nation&#8217;s health care system is performing.  The tool, known as the Health System Measurement Project, will enable policymakers, providers, and the public to develop consistent data-driven views regarding changes in critical U.S. health system indicators. The tool brings together data sets from across the federal government that span topical areas, such as access to care, cost and affordability, prevention and health information technology. It presents these indicators by population characteristics, such as age, sex, income level, insurance coverage, and geography. The measures included in the tool were developed by the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. They are aligned with the HHS Strategic Plan, the National Quality Strategy, and other departmental strategic planning efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/hhs-releases-web-based-search-tool-to-track-health-care-system-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heritage Foundation Recommends Eliminating Premium Subsidy for High Income Beneficiaries to Shore-Up Medicare</title>
		<link>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/heritage-foundation-recommends-eliminating-premium-subsidy-for-high-income-beneficiaries-to-shore-up-medicare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/heritage-foundation-recommends-eliminating-premium-subsidy-for-high-income-beneficiaries-to-shore-up-medicare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmcdowell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Party Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seniors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthreformgps.org/?p=5611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to an issue brief <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/ib3602.pdf" target="_blank">recently published</a> by the Heritage Foundation, wealthy seniors should pay more in Medicare premiums.  Taxpayers spend an extra $4,897 per Medicare beneficiary beyond what is collected in taxes and premiums.  Currently, Medicare beneficiaries pay a basic premium for Part B of $99.90 per month, which covers some costs while the remaining costs are covered by subsidies from the general revenue. The subsidy declines for married seniors with combined income above $170,000. When a senior’s income reaches $428,000, the premium tops out at $319.70 per month, leaving a 20 percent subsidy. According to the report, a retired couple with a $428,000 combined salary would have total financial assets worth more than $7.1 million, excluding the value of their home. In other words, this means that multimillionaire retiree seniors still qualify for a 20 percent Medicare subsidy. The report explores this issue and suggests eliminating premium subsidies for such high income Medicare beneficiaries.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to an issue brief <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/ib3602.pdf" target="_blank">recently published</a> by the Heritage Foundation, wealthy seniors should pay more in Medicare premiums.  Taxpayers spend an extra $4,897 per Medicare beneficiary beyond what is collected in taxes and premiums.  Currently, Medicare beneficiaries pay a basic premium for Part B of $99.90 per month, which covers some costs while the remaining costs are covered by subsidies from the general revenue. The subsidy declines for married seniors with combined income above $170,000. When a senior’s income reaches $428,000, the premium tops out at $319.70 per month, leaving a 20 percent subsidy. According to the report, a retired couple with a $428,000 combined salary would have total financial assets worth more than $7.1 million, excluding the value of their home. In other words, this means that multimillionaire retiree seniors still qualify for a 20 percent Medicare subsidy. The report explores this issue and suggests eliminating premium subsidies for such high income Medicare beneficiaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/heritage-foundation-recommends-eliminating-premium-subsidy-for-high-income-beneficiaries-to-shore-up-medicare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: Medical Loss Ratio Requirements</title>
		<link>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/update-medical-loss-ratio-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/update-medical-loss-ratio-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 06:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dorley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implementation Briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implementation Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Register]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance Reforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical loss ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical-loss ratios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rulemaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthreformgps.org/?p=5593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On May 11, 2012, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a final rule that revises previous medical loss ratio (MLR) rules to establish consumer notification requirements with which insurers must comply when meeting applicable MLR requirements. In a previous December, 2011 final rule governing other aspects of the MLR amendments, HHS had required notification only when insurers did not ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By <a href="http://healthreformgps.org/about-2/authors/sara-rosenbaum-j-d/" target="_blank">Sara Rosenbaum</a></p>
<p>On May 11, 2012, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) <a href="http://www.ofr.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2012-11753_PI.pdf" target="_blank">issued a final rule</a> that revises previous medical loss ratio (MLR) rules to establish consumer notification requirements with which insurers must comply when meeting applicable MLR requirements. In a previous December, 2011 final rule governing other aspects of the MLR amendments, HHS had required notification only when insurers did not satisfy their MLR requirements for a year. The final rule issued in May of 2012 requires notice when the MLR requirements <em>are</em> met, as well. Separate<a href="On May 11, 2012, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a final rule that revises previous medical loss ratio (MLR) rules to establish consumer notification requirements with which insurers must comply when meeting applicable MLR requirements. In a previous December, 2011 final rule governing other aspects of the MLR amendments, HHS had required notification only when insurers did not satisfy their MLR requirements for a year. The final rule issued in May of 2012 requires notice when the MLR requirements are met, as well. Separate notice instructions issued by HHS provide guidance to insurers regarding the structure, content, and timing of the notices, which must be sent by August 1 during the year following the plan year for which the MLR is calculated. " target="_blank"> notice instructions issued</a> by HHS provide guidance to insurers regarding the structure, content, and timing of the notices, which must be sent by August 1 during the year following the plan year for which the MLR is calculated.</p>
<p>The final rule notes that greater information transparency and “competition gains” that accompany transparency outweigh the burden on insurers of having to notify the public, regarding not only whether the MLR has not been satisfied, but also whether an issuer has satisfied its MLR requirements. Insurers had opposed the change because of both the additional burdens imposed and because of the fact that consumers, in receiving the notice, would assume that they were owed a rebate when, in fact, they were not.</p>
<p>Under the final rule, 45 C.F.R. §158.251, insurers in both the individual and group insurance markets will be expected to send a standard notice when their MLR requirements are met. The new regulation applies only to the 2011 MLR reporting year. The new standard notice governing when the MLR has been met reads as follows:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Medical Loss Ratio Information—The Affordable Care Act requires health insurers in the individual and small group markets to spend at least 80 percent of the premiums they receive on health care services and activities to improve health care quality (in the large group market, this amount is 85 percent). This is referred to as the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) rule or the 80/20 rule. If a health insurer does not spend at least 80 percent of the premiums it receives on health care services and activities to improve health care quality, the insurer must rebate the difference.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">A health insurer’s Medical Loss Ratio is determined separately for each State’s individual, small group and large group markets in which the health insurer offers health insurance. In some States, health insurers must meet a higher or lower Medical Loss Ratio. No later than August 1, 2012, health insurers must send any rebates due for 2011 and information to employers and individuals regarding any rebates due for 2011.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">You are receiving this notice because your health insurer had a Medical Loss Ratio for 2011 that met or exceeded the required Medical Loss Ratio. For more information on Medical Loss Ratio and your health insurer’s Medical Loss Ratio, visit <a href="http://www.HealthCare.gov">www.HealthCare.gov</a>.</p>
<p>The Kaiser Family Foundation has estimated that consumers will receive $1.3 billion in rebates in August 2012 as a result of insurers’ failure to satisfy MLR requirements applicable to the group and individual market.<sup>[1]</sup> The Foundation further estimates that the MLR rebates will vary significantly by state, with as many as 96 percent of all consumers in the individual insurance market expected to receive rebates, depending on the state.</p>
<hr size="2" />
<div><span><br />
[1] <a href="http://www.kff.org/healthreform/hr042612nr.cfm">http://www.kff.org/healthreform/hr042612nr.cfm</a> (Accessed May 14, 2012).<br />
</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/update-medical-loss-ratio-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CMS releases final rule on MLR requirements</title>
		<link>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/cms-releases-final-rule-on-mlr-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/cms-releases-final-rule-on-mlr-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 17:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmcdowell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical loss ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthreformgps.org/?p=5606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Centers for Medicare &#38; Medicaid Services (CMS), a department within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/MLRMay112012.pdf" target="_blank">released final rules</a> on Friday May 11th requiring insurers to notify subscribers when the medical loss ratio (MLR) provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is met or exceeded for spending on medical claims or quality improvements.  The <a href="http://healthreformgps.org/resources/hhs-issues-mlr-interim-final-rule/" target="_blank">December 2011</a> interim final rule and final rule on MLR only required that notices be sent to policyholders when insurers did not meet the MLR requirements.

The ACA requires both individual and small group plans to meet the MLR requirements by spending at least 80 percent of premiums on medical claims or quality improvements.  Large plans are required to spend at least 85 percent.  Beginning in August of 2012, insurers must refund the difference to consumers.

The goal of the notice is to educate consumers regarding the MLR measures and to help consumers know that the majority of premium payments go towards health care, as opposed to advertising, executive bonuses, or administrative overhead costs.

HHS said the rule is not expected to have an economic impact of more than $100 million a year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS), a department within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/MLRMay112012.pdf" target="_blank">released final rules</a> on Friday May 11th requiring insurers to notify subscribers when the medical loss ratio (MLR) provision of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is met or exceeded for spending on medical claims or quality improvements.  The <a href="http://healthreformgps.org/resources/hhs-issues-mlr-interim-final-rule/" target="_blank">December 2011</a> interim final rule and final rule on MLR only required that notices be sent to policyholders when insurers did not meet the MLR requirements.</p>
<p>The ACA requires both individual and small group plans to meet the MLR requirements by spending at least 80 percent of premiums on medical claims or quality improvements.  Large plans are required to spend at least 85 percent.  Beginning in August of 2012, insurers must refund the difference to consumers.</p>
<p>The goal of the notice is to educate consumers regarding the MLR measures and to help consumers know that the majority of premium payments go towards health care, as opposed to advertising, executive bonuses, or administrative overhead costs.</p>
<p>HHS said the rule is not expected to have an economic impact of more than $100 million a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/cms-releases-final-rule-on-mlr-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report estimates impact of small business tax credit</title>
		<link>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/report-estimates-impact-of-small-business-tax-credit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/report-estimates-impact-of-small-business-tax-credit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 20:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmcdowell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Party Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Families USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewin Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Majority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthreformgps.org/?p=5588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congress included in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) a significant new tax credit for small business owners who provide their workers with health insurance. Under this new tax credit, businesses that have fewer than 25 full-time workers and average wages of less than $50,000 are now eligible to receive a tax credit of up to 35 percent of the cost of the health insurance that they provide for their workers. To qualify for the tax credit, small businesses must cover at least 50 percent of each employee’s health insurance premiums. In 2014, the size of the credit will increase to cover up to 50 percent of the cost of health insurance provided to workers.

Families USA and Small Business Majority recently commissioned The Lewin Group to <a href="http://healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/Small_Business_Healthcare_Tax_Credit.pdf" target="_blank">develop estimates</a> of the number of small businesses that are eligible for this new tax break in tax year 2011 and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress included in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) a significant new tax credit for small business owners who provide their workers with health insurance. Under this new tax credit, businesses that have fewer than 25 full-time workers and average wages of less than $50,000 are now eligible to receive a tax credit of up to 35 percent of the cost of the health insurance that they provide for their workers. To qualify for the tax credit, small businesses must cover at least 50 percent of each employee’s health insurance premiums. In 2014, the size of the credit will increase to cover up to 50 percent of the cost of health insurance provided to workers.</p>
<p>Families USA and Small Business Majority recently commissioned The Lewin Group to <a href="http://healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/Small_Business_Healthcare_Tax_Credit.pdf" target="_blank">develop estimates</a> of the number of small businesses that are eligible for this new tax break in tax year 2011 and how many workers could potentially benefit as a result. The Lewin Group used their widely respected Health Benefits Simulation Model for these estimates.  The analysis found that more than 3.2 million small businesses, employing 19.3 million workers across the nation, will be eligible for this tax credit when they file their 2011 taxes. In total, these small businesses are eligible for more than $15.4 billion in credits for the 2011 tax year alone, an average of $800 per employee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/report-estimates-impact-of-small-business-tax-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Affairs article explores power of providers to win payment increases</title>
		<link>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/health-affairs-article-explores-power-of-providers-to-win-payment-increases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/health-affairs-article-explores-power-of-providers-to-win-payment-increases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 21:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmcdowell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Party Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthreformgps.org/?p=5581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article published in Health Affairs <a href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/5/973.abstract" target="_blank">entitled</a>, "The Growing Power Of Some Providers To Win Steep Payment Increases From Insurers Suggests Policy Remedies May Be Needed," explores the power that some health care providers, particularly dominant hospital systems, can wield to negotiate higher payment rates from insurers. The report discusses interviews conducted in twelve US communities which indicate that so-called must-have hospital systems and large physician groups can exert considerable market power to obtain steep payment rates from insurers. Other factors, such as offering an important, unique service or access in a particular geographic area, can contribute to provider leverage as well. Even in markets with dominant health plans, insurers generally have not been aggressive in constraining rate increases, perhaps because the insurers can simply pass along the costs to employers and their workers. The findings suggest a range of market and regulatory approaches should be examined in any attempt to address the consequences of growing provider market clout.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article <a href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/5/973.abstract" target="_blank">published</a> in Health Affairs explores the power that some health care providers, particularly dominant hospital systems, can wield to negotiate higher payment rates from insurers. The report discusses interviews conducted in twelve US communities which indicate that so-called must-have hospital systems and large physician groups can exert considerable market power to obtain steep payment rates from insurers. Other factors, such as offering an important, unique service or access in a particular geographic area, can contribute to provider leverage as well. Even in markets with dominant health plans, insurers generally have not been aggressive in constraining rate increases, perhaps because the insurers can simply pass along the costs to employers and their workers. The findings suggest a range of market and regulatory approaches should be examined in any attempt to address the consequences of growing provider market clout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/health-affairs-article-explores-power-of-providers-to-win-payment-increases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Department of Labor releases FAQs on mental health parity compliance</title>
		<link>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/department-of-labor-releases-faqs-on-mental-health-parity-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/department-of-labor-releases-faqs-on-mental-health-parity-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmcdowell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Department of Health and Human Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefit Security Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Security Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.healthreformgps.org/?p=5578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration  <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/faq-mhpaeaimplementation.pdf" target="_blank">published</a> a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding implementation of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008.

Amongst other topics, the FAQs address...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Labor&#8217;s Employee Benefits Security Administration  <a href="http://www.healthreformgps.org/wp-content/uploads/faq-mhpaeaimplementation.pdf" target="_blank">published</a> a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding implementation of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008.</p>
<p>Amongst other topics, the FAQs address whether a health plan can define mental health coverage as solely consisting of inpatient care benefits. The Department of Labor said that plans are not permitted to define mental health coverage as such if they provide benefits under one of the following six classifications of benefits that are subject to the law:</p>
<ul>
<li>inpatient, in-network;</li>
<li>inpatient, out-of-network;</li>
<li>outpatient, in-network;</li>
<li>outpatient, out-of-network;</li>
<li>emergency care; and</li>
<li>prescription drugs.</li>
</ul>
<p>Other topics include oversight of Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) implementation; the law&#8217;s interaction with state mandates; which plans are exempt from MHPAEA; and what the Department of Labor, the Treasury Department, and the Department of Health and Human Services are doing to promote compliance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.healthreformgps.org/resources/department-of-labor-releases-faqs-on-mental-health-parity-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

